Dialogue21.com Family of Forums  

Go Back   Dialogue21.com Family of Forums > Science > Physics > Theoretical Physics' Theories > Pulsoid Theory > Postulate, Corollaries, and Theorems
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Postulate, Corollaries, and Theorems A statement of First Cause.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-14-2008, 07:17 PM
Epsilon=One's Avatar
Epsilon=One Epsilon=One is offline
Avant-garde Sr. Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 207
Default The Postulate of Pulsoid Theory (PPT).

The Postulate of Pulsoid Theory (PPT)
The locus of Reality/Infinity is the Unified Concept.

……....Or, most simply: Something Moves.

There is nothing that exists that is without motion.

The properties of that which exists must be within that from which it evolves.


A first cause, beyond the chaos of Infinity, is described by: the relativity and geometry of seminal motion, which occurs at a random, dimensionless point on a dimensionless sphere at the separation of said dimensionless point and a dimensionless point within said dimensionless sphere.

Said first cause is referred to as the Unified Concept (UC).

It can be rationalized that the dimensionless sphere symbolizes the infinite; and, that the dimensionless point symbolizes the infinitesimal. Together, the infinite and the infinitesimal are congruent and defined as Infinity. And, Reality/existence is the geometry and relativity of that motion which is between (the separation of) the infinitesimal and the infinite.

The Postulate of Pulsoid Theory (PPT) separates Pulsoid Theory (PT) from all other academic, theoretical, physics theories; as, they are all without any rational “first” postulate or a most fundamental axiom.

Most all theoretical theories of physics and biological life depend upon some form of mathematics. Only Pulsoid Theory rationalizes a most fundamental axiom of mathematics without which mathematics is unprovable or incomplete as demonstrated by Kurt Gödel with the “Incompleteness Theorem.” The Incompleteness Theorem has never been successfully refuted until Pulsoid Theory’s discovery of the Elliptical Constant (EC).

Pulsoid Theory’s Pulsoid provides the fundamental proof of mathematics with Unimetry that demonstrates the natural source of numbers and their manipulation; as well as, proving a common denominator, "One," that does not come from outside the set of Natural integers (NI).

From such first cause, because the "clock" of time has yet to "tick," there is entanglement of endless quanta that manifest as a matrix that evolves, tangles, and dissipates as all that exists; thus, that which begins as a singular motion manifests as: laws of nature including mathematics; space; near endless dimensions, including time; forces; fermions; bosons . . . and life.

Each quantum of said matrix is a dynamic, oscillating, pulsating manifestation that is referred to as a Pulsoid, which is an emergent ellipsoid that is heuristically described by the geometry of both the emergent ellipse and tangent, Infinity, integer, circle groups.

Each Pulsoid, a fundamental quantum, from the singular phenomenon of seminal motion, exhibits all the fundamental properties of everything that exists.

Thus, instantly and silently, without trauma, there is a singular matrix that endlessly evolves and dissipates referred to as the Universe that is the resultant of seminal motion, the first cause: the Unified Concept.

Or, most simply: Something Moves.
[center]

©Copyright 2008-2012 by Brunardot. All rights reserved.
Terms: Dialogue21.com, Brunardot, Oscillation Theory, and Pulsoid Theory must be cited.
Sorry! This Thread has not been completed.
Please Bookmark and return to this site often.

If there is an immediate need for information,
please e-mail directly at the below "Click" link.

Please note that any private correspondence
may be edited and anonymously posted unless
requested otherwise.

Every effort will be made to expedite a reply
with the requested information.
Please ask questions.
With questions it’s possible to know if
comments are logical and convincing;
or whether clarification is required.
…........
..........
...........
..........If images don’t display, "click" the Refresh Icon.

Last edited by Epsilon=One : 05-04-2012 at 10:46 AM. Reason: Format and clarify
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-17-2008, 10:10 PM
Midgar21 Midgar21 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 20
Default Starting from scratch.

Greetings.

I would like to start from the beginning, with a basic, elementary approach. This is the "First Postulate," and I would assume, the core foundation to Pulsoid Theory and its consituents.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Epsilon=One View Post
A first cause, beyond the chaos of Infinity, is described by: the relativity and geometry of seminal motion that is the resultant of the separation of a dimensionless sphere and a dimensionless point within the sphere at a random point on the sphere.
I'm not sure I understand how the first act of "seminal motion" is created, by what you are describing. An example, diagram, or some other form of assistance would be preferred to more easily conceptualize this.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Epsilon=One View Post
From such a first cause, because of the effects of entanglement and because the "clock" of time has yet to "tick", endless quanta manifest that will evolve, tangle, and dissipate as all that exists, which begins as a singular motion that will manifest as a force; laws of nature; near endless dimensions, including time; bosons; fermions; space; mathematics . . . and life.
So let me see if I understand this correctly (in layman's terms). Seminal motion is essentially...well, the definition seems to say it: The motion that leads or begins 'something.' This 'something,' if I am correct, is the perpetual chaos of creation that explodes forth and becomes Reality. This in turn builds upon itself to create the forces and fields that we are familiar with in the everyday.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Epsilon=One View Post
A single such quantum has the fundamental form of a dynamically, oscillating and pulsating emergent ellipsoid that is heuristically described by the geometry of the emergent ellipse.
Is this "single such quantum" the quantisized form of seminal motion? If so, then is a "pulsating emergent ellipsoid" that is defined by the "emergent ellipse" the architecture of seminal motion?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Epsilon=One View Post
It is said fundamental quantum, from the single phenomenon of seminal motion, that exhibits all the properties of existence.

Thus, all the properties of existence manifest from the single phenomenon of seminal motion . . . the first cause: the Unified Concept.
Again as I said, I am assuming seminal motion is the real key here; for it is what seminal motion produces that is inherent in all existence. Is this correct? If so, what is the product of seminal motion--what is the phenomenon?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-17-2008, 10:26 PM
Epsilon=One's Avatar
Epsilon=One Epsilon=One is offline
Avant-garde Sr. Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 207
Default Congratulations!!!

Your questions are excellent and quite appreciated.

The post you have replied to is an ad hoc post that was intended as a placeholder while I research some old statements in several manuscripts.

I will try to do this today. The edited post should not affect your questions; though they will slightly affect my reply.

This forum is not officially open until it is posted to www.Dialogue21.com. I am privy to inside information for the first post; you have somehow managed the first reply without such an advantage.

Congratulations!!!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-19-2008, 03:26 AM
Epsilon=One's Avatar
Epsilon=One Epsilon=One is offline
Avant-garde Sr. Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 207
Default The concept of seminal motion (SM) is the “mystery” of the Unified Concept (UC).

I have slightly modified the first ad hoc post for clarity; however, I don't believe that your quotes therefrom or questions are greatly effected.

Any further refinements of the "Postulate" other than minor format or grammar will be relegated to current posts within the thread. Wanting to reply to your perceptive questions quickly has dissuaded any search of "dusty" manuscripts that are likely incomplete anyway.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Midgar21 View Post
I would like to start from the beginning, with a basic, elementary approach. This is the "First Postulate," and I would assume, the core foundation to Pulsoid Theory and its consituents.
Yes.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Midgar21 View Post
I'm not sure I understand how the first act of "seminal motion" is created, by what you are describing.
The concept of Seminal motion (SM) is the “mystery” of the Unified Concept (UC) that, as a concept, was first discussed with Philip Morrison in the spring of 1955 slightly before the death of Albert Einstein. It is this concept that I consider the beginning of String Theory (ST), which is a theory that subsequently went quite awry within academia.

The concept of why there is “first motion” is the minimal faith that Pulsoid Theory (PT) requires. Such faith does not seem unwarranted, or difficult to accept; as, there is nothing that exists that does not have motion.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Midgar21 View Post
An example, diagram, or some other form of assistance would be preferred to more easily conceptualize this.
Such diagrams exist that explain the geometry, and have been posted in a rudimental form elsewhere. As time allows, they will be posted here in more detail.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Midgar21 View Post
So let me see if I understand this correctly (in layman's terms). Seminal motion is essentially...well, the definition seems to say it: The motion that leads or begins 'something.' This 'something,' if I am correct, is the perpetual chaos of creation that explodes forth and becomes Reality. This in turn builds upon itself to create the forces and fields that we are familiar with in the everyday.
Yes.

In the context that you are using the words “chaos” and “explodes forth” which can confusingly carry opposing connotations referring to Infinity and the Big Bang, respectively; I prefer words such as “complexly entangled in accordance with set laws described by mathematics” be used for “chaos” and “instantly exists” for “explodes forth.” (As yet, there is no time; thus, no coefficients of speed.) This locus of the UC between Infinity and Reality is somewhat analogous to a Bose-Einstein condensate (BEC).

Quote:
Originally Posted by Midgar21 View Post
Is this "single such quantum" the quantisized form of seminal motion?
In a sense, Yes. Though, technically, when SM forms a quantum, the motion is referred to as Triquametric motion (TM).

Quote:
Originally Posted by Midgar21 View Post
If so, then is a "pulsating emergent ellipsoid" that is defined by the "emergent ellipse" the architecture of seminal motion?
I believe that the Pulsoid can be said to be the “architecture” of the Universe and its geometry and relativity are the inevitable consequence of SM.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Midgar21 View Post
Again as I said, I am assuming seminal motion is the real key here; for it is what seminal motion produces that is inherent in all existence. Is this correct?
Again, in a sense, Yes. Though, the concept of TM is more salient to what is observable.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Midgar21 View Post
If so, what is the product of seminal motion--what is the phenomenon?
Specifically, the Pulsoid; generally, existence.

Last edited by Epsilon=One : 01-25-2008 at 11:45 PM. Reason: Add URL
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-25-2008, 09:05 PM
Midgar21 Midgar21 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 20
Default Triquametric Motion?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Epsilon=One View Post
Though, technically, when SM forms a quantum the motion is referred to as Triquametric motion (TM).
I've heard you use this term before, along with "Quaquametric motion" (I understand that these are neologisms). What precisely are these? Forms of motion? Trajectories? A shape that explains a certain movement pathway? (i.e., spherical, elliptical, hyperbolic, etc.)

From what it seems, "seminal motion" is a concept or label rather than an actual tangible thing, but it is used to describe the phenomenon that triquametric motion patterns cause (that is to say, triquametric motion is the 'starter' that forms existence). Can I say, then, that it is triquametric motion that is "seminal"?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Epsilon=One View Post
Though, the concept of TM is more salient to what is observable.
Again, this supports my above postulation; that seminal motion is not actually a 'thing,' but rather, it is a concept inherent in triquametric motion. Are my inquiries along the right lines? If so, please address and continue to explain TM and QM.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-25-2008, 09:21 PM
Epsilon=One's Avatar
Epsilon=One Epsilon=One is offline
Avant-garde Sr. Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 207
Default Your understanding is excellent.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Midgar21 View Post
Again, this supports my above postulation; that seminal motion is not actually a 'thing,' but rather, it is a concept inherent in triquametric motion. Are my inquiries along the right lines? If so, please address and continue to explain TM and QM.
Your understanding is excellent. To properly reply requires the posting of several detailed definitions that will be linked both from here (in a following post) and from the Postulate.

The definitions will be clearly posted in the PT Definitions thread.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:28 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.