Dialogue21.com Family of Forums The internal geometry of a Light wave
 User Name Remember Me? Password
 FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 Postulate, Corollaries, and Theorems A statement of First Cause.

 Thread Tools Display Modes
#1
03-15-2008, 07:59 AM
 Epsilon=One Avant-garde Sr. Member Join Date: Jan 2008 Posts: 207
The internal geometry of a Light wave

The internal geometry of a Light wave

The internal geometry of a Light wave is, heuristically represented by a two-dimensional Brunardot Ellipse (BE).

Light "waves" are expanding, dissipating, ellipsoidal structures that are generated; by functions of time and rotation about the major diameter of said, heuristic, Brunardot Ellipse (BE); from seminal motion that manifests as Triquametric motion (TM): relativistic, complex oscillating, ellipsoidal structures with internal resonances. The internal resonances which manifest as mass are referred to as Resoloids. Light is the traumatic ejection of said Resoloids.

Only Pulsoid Theory (PT) precisely explains where the almost inexhaustible energy within a light wave originates; which is also the identical locus of the, hitherto, inexplicable energy within the atom.

The light wave is the resultant of the seminal motion of the Unified Concept (UC), where the geometry of dynamic, emergent separation (DES) also establishes: the orthogonal dimensions; The Inverse Square Law; fundamental, intrinsic time (FIT); Natural integers and their basic arithmetical manipulations that underlie all mathematics such as the Natural function NF and it corollaries: the Golden Ratio, the Brunardot Series of which the revised Fibonacci sequence is a sequence; and the Natural prime numbers that are the “yardsticks” of Nature's scale.

Legend for a Brunardot Ellipse

Line AD = radius = r
Line BA = hypotenuse = h
Line BC = soliton = s
Line BD = wave = w
Line BF = vector = v
Line CA = diagonal radial = d
Line CF = amplitude = a
Line EB = perigee = p
Line ED = apogee = o
Line EF = diameter chord = c
Line EG = major diameter = M
Line FH = minor diameter = L
Line JA = diagonal = D

©Copyright 2005-2008 by Brunardot. All rights reserved.
Terms: Dialogue21.com, Brunardot, and Pulsoid Theory must be cited.
Sorry! This Thread has not been completed.
Please Bookmark and return to this site often.

If there is an immediate need for information,
please e-mail directly at the below "Click" link.

Please note that any private correspondence
may be edited and anonymously posted unless
requested otherwise.

Every effort will be made to expedite a reply
with the requested information.
Please ask questions.
With questions it’s possible to know if
comments are logical and convincing;
or whether clarification is required.
.....
..........
..........If images don’t display, "click" the Refresh Icon.
__________________
..."Click" to E-mail Me Directly
......Or, use a Forum Private Message

....."Seek simplicity; and
....... . . Natural integers."

..........Challenge to Academe
...The Purpose of Pulsoid Theory
..........
...........Forum Designer
#2
04-02-2008, 01:27 AM
 Midgar21 Senior Member Join Date: Jan 2008 Posts: 20
If the glove fits...

I would assume that one of the greatest statements Pulsoid Theory could claim would be the structure and composition of light. Can this be empirically supported, aside from inference?

I'm not sure of the following question's validity, as I don't believe I am familiar with much of Pulsoid Theory's supplementary content as of yet, but perhaps it can illicit certain responses.

It seems that Pulsoid Theory has been constructed in such a manner that it, itself, cannot actually be proven; rather, it can only prove. We know that PT starts from the ground up, starting with the most fundamental concepts of math and science to eventually explain even the most seemingly-complex natural phenomena. It would make sense, then, that the explanations behind said phenomena would be ultimately correct because of the source from which they are constructed (PT utilizes no assumptions or theories that are not ultimately derived from simple Nature, [this may be from the idea that the derivation of Epsilon refutes the Incompleteness Theorem; not sure] and so generally, the only thing left debatable within PT are esoteric arguments of visualization, confusion, conception, or word-use).

It would seem that the essence of Pulsoid Theory is that the physical phenomena of the Universe can all be ultimately described by the most fundamental, simple, and natural systems of mathematics. If the glove fits, great. But does that mean that it's the glove being worn? Is there a way we can see the glove of reality? Pulsoid Theory is supposed to conform to (or be a product) IPSO. So aside from the argument that "it is the most logical explanation of Reality to-date," there must be some observable, empirical evidence that directly supports Pulsoid Theory, which can allow us to point and say: "this proves that the tenets of Pulsoid Theory prevail throughout physical reality." Is there?

If there is none, then a more ontological question is appropriate for finality: If System A accurately describes a subset, and System A cannot be proven as incorrect using any another system, is System A truth? Is Pulsoid Theory proven solely because it cannot be disproven?

Not sure if any of this makes sense...not really feelin on-the-ball today (sick; not too keen on re-reading). Of course, there actually may be empirical evidence that heavily suggests PT, in which case this argument is for naught

Last edited by Midgar21 : 04-02-2008 at 08:46 AM.
#3
12-02-2008, 03:05 AM
 Epsilon=One Avant-garde Sr. Member Join Date: Jan 2008 Posts: 207
The glove fits . . .

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Midgar21 I would assume that one of the greatest statements Pulsoid Theory could claim would be the structure and composition of light. Can this be empirically supported, aside from inference?
Yes; quite a bit of observation can leave no other conclusion concerning radiant energy (bosonic phenomena) than as represented by the heuristic symbolization of its internal structure as a pulsating Emergent Ellipsoid that is a Resoloid ejected as the consequence of Critical Compression (CrC).

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Midgar21 I'm not sure of the following question's validity, as I don't believe I am familiar with much of Pulsoid Theory's supplementary content as of yet, but perhaps it can illicit certain responses.
Excellent approach . . .

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Midgar21 It seems that Pulsoid Theory has been constructed in such a manner that it, itself, cannot actually be proven; rather, it can only prove.
The proof may be somewhat subjective; i.e. Pulsoid Theory reconciles known enigmas in accordance with IPSO; however, there are certain significant observations and philosophical logic that strongly supports many of Pulsoid Theory’s most contentious premises.

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Midgar21 We know that PT starts from the ground up, starting with the most fundamental concepts of math and science to eventually explain even the most seemingly-complex natural phenomena.
Exactly. An approach that no Standard Model theory utilizes . . . even the Big Bang theory is silent concerning its genesis . . . and “container.”

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Midgar21 It would make sense, then, that the explanations behind said phenomena would be ultimately correct because of the source from which they are constructed (PT utilizes no assumptions or theories that are not ultimately derived from simple Nature, [this may be from the idea that the derivation of Epsilon refutes the Incompleteness Theorem; not sure] and so generally, the only thing left debatable within PT are esoteric arguments of visualization, confusion, conception, or word-use).
I agree. Pulsoid Theory is intended as a superstructure to be tweaked as knowledge and wisdom increase.

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Midgar21 It would seem that the essence of Pulsoid Theory is that the physical phenomena of the Universe can all be ultimately described by the most fundamental, simple, and natural systems of mathematics. If the glove fits, great.
”The glove fits.”

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Midgar21 But does that mean that it's the glove being worn? Is there a way we can see the glove of reality? Pulsoid Theory is supposed to conform to (or be a product) IPSO. So aside from the argument that "it is the most logical explanation of Reality to-date," there must be some observable, empirical evidence that directly supports Pulsoid Theory, which can allow us to point and say: "this proves that the tenets of Pulsoid Theory prevail throughout physical reality." Is there?
Yes. There are many. Such as: “dark” matter effects; accelerating, galactic recession; high energy, background radiation; the Pioneer anomaly; a philosophically logical explanation of the Universe’s “container”; the particle/wave duality of light; an explanation of what “half-spin” is; an explanation of why mathematics is apt for explaining Nature; etc.; etc. You seem to understand the “drill” . . .

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Midgar21 If there is none, then a more ontological question is appropriate for finality: If System A accurately describes a subset, and System A cannot be proven as incorrect using any another system, is System A truth? Is Pulsoid Theory proven solely because it cannot be disproven?
I do not consider that PT rationalizes the metaphysical. I do not consider the fundamental concepts of PT to be an ontological argument; for the reason that: I consider solid philosophical logic to be something more. Of course, I understand that concepts such as Infinity can never be observed.

And, Yes!; much of PT's strength, beyond logic and observation, is that it cannot be disproven. The proof of a negative is one of the strongest arguments.

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Midgar21 Not sure if any of this makes sense...not really feelin on-the-ball today (sick; not too keen on re-reading). Of course, there actually may be empirical evidence that heavily suggests PT, in which case this argument is for naught
I can empathize with feeling sick; lately, it has been difficult for me to apply myself as much as usual; thus, the unseemly delay. Each day is much better.

There is much to be desired from rapid forum postings; I do not consider your argument or time “for naught” . . . just the opposite. As for re-reading, I find it, for myself, as almost useless until some significant time has lapsed. Which never seems to be the situation in forum posting.
__________________
..."Click" to E-mail Me Directly
......Or, use a Forum Private Message

....."Seek simplicity; and
....... . . Natural integers."

..........Challenge to Academe
...The Purpose of Pulsoid Theory
..........
...........Forum Designer

 Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts vB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is Off
 Forum Jump User Control Panel Private Messages Subscriptions Who's Online Search Forums Forums Home Dialogue21 Home Page & Content Navigation Forum Procedures & General Information     How to Join and Post at the Dialogue21.com Forum     General Information     Procedures     Introductions Members' Personal Forums     Brunardot's Rants         Medical     Gill H. Boehringer, writings of     NptBchLady's Blog     Pioneering Over Five Epochs     Train's Dialogue Activities: Educational, Leisure, Hobbies, & Sports     General Sports: Fan Comments     Backpacking     Golf     Motorsports         Moto Cross (MX)     Photography     Reading, Listening & Viewing         Books     Skiing     Tennis     Vacation Areas, Unique     Weight Lifting     Track. Field, and Crosscountry Ecology     Food Production and Supply     Global Warming     Species Preservation Economics     Socialism Education     General Education K - 12     Curriculum, Evaluation and Management Centre Engineering and Applied Science     Electrical Engineering Entertainment     Audible CDs, DVDs, and Books         Audible CDs, DVDs, and Books Table of Contents     Movies and Videos         Movies and Videos Table of Contents     Music         Music Table of Contents Fine Arts     Architecture Genealogy, Classmates, and other Friends     Procedures and Additional Resource Links     RSeasons.com         Hey! This Is . me         Hey! This Is . us         RFamilyData         RBirths         RSurnames         RFamilyTrees         RSnapshots         RFriends         RReunions         RTidings         RAnnouncements         ROccasions         RRemembrances         RBiographies         RHistories         RFuneralHomes         RObituaries         REulogies         RCemeteries         REpitaphs         RStorage         Isely         Marty     Classmates     Fraternities, Sororities and Honorary Groups     Neighbors Health     Tips, Fads, Comments, and more History     Ancient History     from Ancient to Modern History     Modern History Interdisciplinary Studies     Defining Interdisciplinary Studies Literature     Biographies         Author         Subject         Title     Classical Books     Non-Fiction Books         Excerpts, Annotations, and Comments     Poetry, General     Poetry for Scientists     Quotations Marketing     Internet Marketing Mathematics     General Mathematics     Homework     Algebra     Calculus     Geometry     Pure Arithmetic         Fibonacci Sequence, the Golden Ratio; pi, e, Zero, One, etc.     Trigonometry Philogic Philosophy     General Philosophy     Conceptualism         Round the Bend             Chapter One             Chapter Two             Chapter Three             Chapter Four             Chapter Five             Chapter Six             Chapter Seven             Chapter Eight             Chapter Nine             Chapter Ten             Chapter Eleven     Philosophers Photographs, Snapshots, Images, etc.     Members     Random Photographs     Kubly Politics     American (U.S.A.)         Conservative         Liberal Science     General Science     Astronomy         Cosmogony         Cosmology             Sean Carroll, Caltech Theoretical Physicist, Senior Research Associate                 "From Eternity to Here": The Quest for the Ultimate Theory of Time, © Sean Carroll 2010                     Prologue: ...about the nature of time, the beginning of the universe, and its underlying structure             Neil deGrasse Tyson, Director, Hayden Planetarium and project scientist of the Rose Center for Earth     Atmospheric Science     Biology         Biochemistry     Chemistry     Computer Science     Genomics     Green Chemistry     Organic Chemistry     Physics         Articles and Comments, Professionally Published         General Physics         Homework         Theoretical Physics' Theories             Cosmic Relativity             The Higgs Boson             Quantum Mechanics             Loop Quantum Gravity             Relativity             Oscillation Theory             String Theories & Branes                 The Elegant Universe, Brian Greene, 2003, 1999                     Table of Contents (TOC)                     2003 Preface                     Preface (1999)                     Part I - The Edge of Knowledge                         Chapter 1. Tied Up with String                     Part II - The Dilemma of Space, Time, and the Quanta                         Chapter 2. Space, Time, and the Eye of the Beholder                         Chapter 3. Of Warps and Ripples                         Chapter 4. Microscopic Weirdness                         Chapter 5. The Need for a New Theory: General Relativity vs. Quantum Mechanics                     Part III - The Cosmic Symphony                         Chapter 6. Nothing but Music: The Essentials of Superstring Theory                         Chapter 7. The "Super" in Superstrings                         Chapter 8. More Dimensions Than Meet the Eye                         Chapter 9. The Smoking Gun: Experimental Signatures                     Part IV - String Theory and the Fabric of Spacetime                         Chapter 10. Quantum Geometry                         Chapter 11. Tearing the Fabric of Space                         Chapter 12. Beyond Strings: In Search of M-Theory                         Chapter 13. Black Holes: A String/M-Theory Perspective                         Chapter 14. Reflections on Cosmology                     Part V - Unification in the Twenty-First Century                         Chapter 15. Prospects                     Notes                     Glossary of Scientific Terms                     References and Suggestions for Further Reading                 The Fabric of the Cosmos, Brian Greene, 2004                     Table of Contents                     Preface                     Part I - Reality's Arena                         Chapter 1. Roads to Reality                         Chapter 2. The Universe and the Bucket                         Chapter 3: Relativity and the Absolute                         Chapter 4: Entangling Space                     Part II - Time and Experience                         Chapter 5: The Frozen River                         Chapter 6: Chance and the Arrow                         Chapter 7: Time and the Quantum                     Part III - Spacetime and Cosmology                         Chapter 8. Of Snowflakes and Spacetime                         Chapter 9. Vaporizing the Vacuum                         Chapter 10. Deconstructing the Bang                         Chapter 11. Quanta in the Sky with Diamonds                     Part IV - Origins and Unification                         Chapter 12. The World on a String                         Chapter 13. The Universe on a Brane                     Part V - Reality and the Imagination                         Chapter 14. Up in the Heavens and Down in the Earth                         Chapter 15. Teleporters and Time Machines                         Chapter 16: The Future of an Allusion                     Notes                     Glossary             Other Theories                 Moving Dimension Theory             Pulsoid Theory                 Pulsoid Theory: Understanding our Total Environment                 Pulsoid Theory Manuscript (w/the Unified Concept & Elliptical Constant)                 Postulate, Corollaries, and Theorems                 Definitions, Index, and General Information                 Related Posts Index (RPI)                 Quotations Social Science     Geonomics     Society and the Law Theology     General Theology     General Religion and Cults     Atheism     Bahá'í Faith     Buddhism     Christianity     Conceptualism     Humanism     Islam     IPSOism     Kabbalah     Mormonism     ONEness         ONEness Creed     Scientology Websites, Forums, Blogs, and Print Media     Educational and of Unusual Interest         The Bulletin Online         Information Clearing House         NASA         Science News         YouTube and Miscellaneous videos             Flying Over America -- YouTube (Click Back Arrow to Return to D21 Forum)     Resumes Blogs FEEDBACK: From Members and Guests     Sit back, Relax, Enjoy, Smile . . . and, maybe Laugh a bit! CREED: Album Music Test

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:32 PM.

 Contact Us - Dialogue21.com Family of Forums - Archive - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.